Main Article Content
Abstract
The article proves that the professional competence of a doctor is developed on the basis of mastering the method of examining a patient in combination with a purposeful selection of literature, accompanied by lectures, seminars and practical classes. In the educational process, it is advisable to change the vector from an informative approach to direct medical and methodological work (activity approach).
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Belogurova VA. Scientific organization of the educational process: textbook. M.: GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2010. 512 p. Russian (Белогурова В.А. Научная организация учебного процесса: учебное пособие. М.: ГЭТАР-Медиа, 2010. 512 с.)
Botkin SP. Speech delivered at the solemn act at the Imperial Military Medical Academy, December 7, 1886. Clinical lectures by Professor S.P. Botkin. 1th ed. Peterburg.2011. p. 1-17. Russian (Боткин С.П. Речь, произнесенная на торжественном акте в Императорской Военно-Медицинской академии, 7 декабря 1886 г. //Клинические лекции профессора С.П. Боткина. Выпуск I. Петербург. 1888. С. 1-17)
Gromyko YuV. On the problem of creating a public school of the future: a synthesis of subject and project education. Psychological Science and Education. 2018; 23(6): 5-10. Russian (Громыко Ю.В. К проблеме создания общенародной школы будущего: синтез предметного и проектного образования //Психологическая наука и образование. 2018. Т. 23, № 1. С. 93-105)
Kuz'minov OM, Pshenichnykh LA, Krupen'kina LA. Formation of clinical thinking and modern information technologies in education. Belgorod, 2012. 110 р. Russian (Кузьминов О.М., Пшеничных Л.А., Крупенькина Л.А. Формирование клинического мышления и современных информационных технологий в образовании. Белгород, 2012. 110 с.)
Mark et al. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Clinical Quality Committee. JACC. 2014; 63(7): 698-721