THE APPLICATION OF THE ROBSON METHOD TO ANALYSIS AND SEARCH FOR OPPORTUNITIES TO REDUCE THE FREQUENCY OF CAESAREAN SECTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF KHAKASIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose – to analyze the frequency of caesarean sections using the method of M. Robson, to assess the possibility of reducing this indicator in the Republic of Khakassia.
Material and methods. It was carried the retrospective and comparative analysis out of according to the 10-group classification of M. Robson by a continuous method: 2226 birth histories that took place over 8 months from January to August 2022 and 3606 birth histories for 2020 in the Republican Clinical Perinatal Center, Abakan.
Results. In 2022, compared to 2020, there was an increase in the frequency of caesarean sections in the RCPC due to groups 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, while there is a decrease in groups 2, 3, 4. Careful selection of patients for induction of labor made it possible, on the one hand, to increase the frequency of delivery through the natural birth canal in induced labor (groups 2, 3, 4). There is the increase in operative delivery in groups with spontaneous development of labor (group 1), vaginal delivery with the scar on the uterus (group 5), breech presentation of the fetus (group 6 and 7) and multiple pregnancy (group 7).
Conclusions. The Robson classification allows to analyze the frequency of caesarean sections in dynamics and find ways to reduce it in an obstetric hospital of the 3rd level. The greatest influence on the overall incidence of CS in the Perinatal Center is exerted by the proportion of abdominal delivery in groups of singleton full-term pregnancies in cephalic presentation, including those with a history of caesarean section (groups 1 and 5) and births in breech presentation (groups 6 and 7).
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates, 2015
Collection of statistical materials. Republican Medical Information and Analytical Center. 2023. Russian (Сборник статистических материалов. Республиканский медицинский информационно-аналитический центр, 2023)
Tkachenko LV, Verovsky TA, Kostenko TI, Skladanowsky TV, Sviridova NI, Babayeva LK. Applying the Robson classification to find ways to reduce the frequency of cesarean section operations. Journal of VolgSMU. 2020; 2(74): 87-90. Russian (Ткаченко Л.В., Веровская Т.А., Костенко Т.И., Складановская Т.В., Свиридова Н.И., Бабаева Л.К. Применение классификации Робсона для поиска путей снижения частоты операций кесарева сечения //Вестник ВолгГМВ. 2020. № 2(74). С. 87-90)
Tanaka K, Mahomed K. The Ten-Group Robson Classification: A single centre approach identifying strategies to optimise caesarean section rates. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2017: 2017: 5648938. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5648938
Wood S, Cooper S, Rossa S. Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta analysis of trials in women with intact membranes. BJOG. 2014; 121(6): 674-685. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12328
Robson M. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001; 12: 23-39.
Rudzevich AY, Kukarskaya II, Filgus TA. Analysis of cesarean section rate according to the Robson classification. Modern problems of science and education. 2017; (6). Russian (Рудзевич А.Ю., Кукарская И.И., Фильгус Т.А. Оценка частоты кесарева сечения по классификации Робсона //Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2017. № 6)
Recommendations for the implementation and use and classification of caesarean section M. Robson (methodical letter). M., 2019. 18 p. Russian (Рекомендации по внедрению и использованию и классификации операции кесарева сечения М. Робсона (методическое письмо). М., 2019. 18 с.)
Nakamura-Pereira M, do Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Domingues RMSM, Torres JA, Dias MAB, Moreira ME. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health. 2016; 13(Suppl 3): 128. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7
Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. A Systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn`t work and how to improve it. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6): e97769. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769
Boatin AA, Cullinane F, Torloni MR, Betran AP. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018; 125(1): 36-42. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14774
Gladkaya VS, Tikhonovich AV, Gritsinskaya VL. Clinical and psychological aspects of vaginal hildbirth in women with a scar on the uterine. Modern medicine new approaches and current research: Collection of materials of the international scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the Medical Institute of the Chechen State University. Grozny, 2020. P. 231-236. Russian (Гладкая В.С., Тихонович А.В., Грицинская В.Л. Клинико-психологические аспекты вагинальных родов у женщин с рубцом на матке //Современная медицина новые подходы и актуальные исследования: Сб. матер. междунар. науч.-практ. конф., посвященной 30-летнему юбилею Медицинского института ФГБОУ ВО «Чеченский государственный университет». Грозный, 2020. С. 231-236)
Gladkaya VS, Tikhonovich AV, Kartashova AA. Peculiarities of the vaginal birth in women with a scar on the uterus after cesarean section. Bulletin of KhGU them. N.F. Katanov. 2016; 18: 114-117. Russian (Гладкая В.С., Тихонович А.В., Карташова А.А. Особенности течения родов естественным путем у женщин с рубцом на матке после кесарева сечения //Вестник ХГУ им. Н.Ф. Катанова. 2016. № 18. С. 114-117)
Postoperative uterine scar requiring maternal care during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period: Federal clinical guidelines. 2023. Russian (Послеоперационный рубец на матке, требующий предоставления медицинской помощи матери во время беременности, родов и в послеродовом периоде: Федеральные клинические рекомендации. 2023)
Prameela RC, Farha D, Bhanumati P, Prajwa S. Analysis of Caesarean Section Rate in a Tertiary Hospital – according to Robson’s 10 Group Classification System (TGCS). IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2015; 14(2): 46-49