APPLYING OF ROBSON CLASSIFICATION FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE WORK OBSTETARY HOSPITAL 3 LEVEL AND SEARCHING FOR WAYS TO REDUCE FREQUENCY OF THE CAESAREAN SECTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The goal of our work was a retrospective analysis of work of the regional perinatal center in 2012 and 2017 using Robson's 10 group classification to find ways to reduce caesarean section rate in inpatient level 3.
Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of the delivery histories of patients of the State Healthcare Institution «Regional Perinatal Center» in 2012 and 2017 for the 10-group Robson classification. A total of 7629 delivery histories were analyzed, of which3605 in 2012 (out of 4,081 delivery – 88.3 %) and4024 in 2017 (out of 4284 delivery – 93.9 %).
Main provisions. In 2017, compared with 2012, there was no increase in the frequency of caesarean section in regional perinatal center due to its significant decrease in groups 1, 2 and 4, and an unreliable decrease in group 3. Careful selection of patients for timely delivery allowed, on the one hand, to ensure maximum frequency conservative delivery in timely delivery (groups No. 2 and 4), and on the other hand, to minimize abdominohysterotomy in groups with spontaneous delivery (groups No. 1 and 3). Due to the careful selection of patients for vaginal delivery with a scar on the uterus, there was a decrease in the frequency of abdominohysterotomyin group 5, which also contributed to curbing the increase in the frequency of Caesarean section (CS) in Regional perinatal center.
Results. The Robson classification allows you to analyze frequency of CS in groups in dynamics and find ways to reduce it in obstetric hospital level 3. The share of abdominal delivery in groups of maturesignificant with cranial presentation including those with a history of CS (groups No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), has the greatest impact on the overall frequency of CS in the perinatal center.
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Fischer A, LaCoursiere DY, Barnard P, Bloebaum L, Varner M. Differences Between Hospitals in Cesarean Rates for Term Primigravidas With Cephalic Presentation. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005. 105(4): 816-821
Tanaka K, Mahomed K. The Ten-Group Robson Classification: A single centre approach identifying strategies to optimise caesarean section rates. Obstetrics and Gynecology International Volume. 2017; Article ID 5648938: 5 p.
Nakamura-Pereira M, do Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Soares Madeira Domingues RM, Alves Torres J, Bastos Dias MA, Moreira ME.. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth. Reproductive Health. 2016; 13(Suppl 3): 128
Wood S, Cooper S, Rossa S. Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes. BJOG. 2014; 121: 674-685
Radzinsky VE. Obstetric aggression. V. 2. M., 2017. 871 p. Russian (Радзинский В.Е. Акушерская агрессия. V. 2. М., 2017. 871 с.)
Robson M. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med. Rev. 2001; 12: 23-39
Souter V, Jodie K, Chien A. The Robson Classification: Monitoring and Comparing Cesarean Delivery Rates. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 127: 131S
Boatin AA, Cullinane F, Torloni MR, Betr AP. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard. BJOG. 2018; 125: 36-42
Rudzevich AY, Kukarskaya II, Filgus TA. Analysis of cesarean section rate according to the Robson classification. Modern problems of science and education. 2017; (6). URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=27171. Russian (Рудзевич А.Ю., Кукарская И.И., Фильгус Т.А. Оценка частоты кесарева сечения по классификации Робсона //Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2017. № 6. URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=27171)
Guriev DL, Stepanova EM, Soloukhina OE, Sinkevich LA, Muradova MA, Ershova YuV. Implementing Federal Clinical Protocol «Gestational Diabetes Mellitus» in Yaroslavl region. Doctor.Ru. 2016; 7(124): 61-66. Russian (Гурьев Д.Л., Степанова Е.М., Солоухина О.Е., Синкевич Л.А., Мурадова М.А., Ершова Ю.В. Внедрение федерального клинического протокола «Гестационный сахарный диабет» в Ярославской области //Доктор.Ru. 2016. № 7(124). С. 61-66)
Pelvic presentation of the fetus (management of pregnancy and childbirth): Federal clinical guidelines. 2017. Russian (Тазовое предлежание плода (ведение беременности и родов): Федеральные клинические рекомендации. 2017)