Main Article Content

Oksana Nikolaevna Novikova
Alena Olegovna Veys

Abstract

Prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at term remains a significant issue in modern obstetrics and is associated with an increased risk of maternal and neonatal complications. Studying clinical and anamnestic characteristics and pregnancy course in this group of women is essential for optimizing management strategies and preventing adverse outcomes.
Aim – to investigate the clinical and anamnestic profile of women with term prelabor rupture of membranes and to identify features of pregnancy course in a regional obstetric hospital.
Materials and Methods. A retrospective cross-sectional study included 100 women with term PROM (≥ 37 weeks of gestation) who delivered in 2024 at the maternity unit of the Kuzbass Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital named after Yu.A. Atamanov. Sociodemographic characteristics, somatic, gynecological and obstetric history, pregnancy complications, and laboratory findings were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using StatTech v.4.9.5 software.
Results. The median age of the patients was 26 [22-33] years. Most women were urban residents (71%), employed (64%), and had secondary vocational education (43%). Somatic comorbidities were common, with the highest prevalence of eye diseases (22%), urinary system disorders (20%), and cardiovascular diseases (16%). Overweight and obesity were observed in 20% of cases.
Reproductive history analysis revealed induced abortions in 20% of women, missed miscarriages and spontaneous abortions in 12%. Pregnancy complications occurred in 31% of patients, with gestational anemia (47%), gestational hypertension (11%), and urinary tract infections being the most frequent. Vaginal infections during pregnancy were diagnosed in 59% of women, predominantly bacterial vaginosis (43%).
Conclusion. Women with term prelabor rupture of membranes demonstrate a high prevalence of somatic and obstetric comorbidities as well as a significant burden of adverse reproductive history. These findings highlight the need for a comprehensive and individualized approach to pregnancy management in this population to reduce complications and improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Keywords

prelabor rupture of membranes, term pregnancy, clinical and anamnestic profile, pregnancy complications

Author Biographies

Oksana Nikolaevna Novikova,

doctor of medical sciences, docent, professor of the department of obstetrics and gynecology named after G.A. Ushakova

Alena Olegovna Veys,

postgraduate student of the department of obstetrics and gynecology named after G.A. Ushakova

Article Details

Information about financing and conflict of interests

The study had no sponsorship.
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

How to Cite

Novikova, O. N., & Veys, A. O. (2026). CLINICAL AND ANAMNESTIC CHARACTERISTICS AND FEATURES OF THE COURSE OF PREGNANCY IN WOMEN WITH PREMATURE RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM. Mother and Baby in Kuzbass, 2, 51-55. https://www.mednauki.ru/index.php/MD/article/view/1403

References

1. Ramirez-Montesinos L, Downe S, Ramsden A. Systematic review on the management of term prelabour rupture of membranes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1): 650. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05878-x

2. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 188: Prelabor Rupture of Membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131(1): e1-e14. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002455

3. Burckova H, Stranik J, Musilova I, Matulova J, Jacobsson B, Kacerovsky M. Intra-amniotic inflammatory complications in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(25): 5993-5998. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1903859

4. Al-Lawama M, AlZaatreh A, Elrajabi R, Abdelhamid S, Badran E. Prolonged Rupture of Membranes, Neonatal Outcomes and Management Guidelines. J Clin Med Res. 2019; 11(5): 360-366. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3809

5. Lin D, Hu B, Xiu Y, Ji R, Zeng H, Chen H, Wu Y. Risk factors for premature rupture of membranes in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2024; 14(3): e077727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077727

6. Delorme P, Lorthe E, Sibiude J, Kayem G. Preterm and term prelabour rupture of membranes: a review of timing and methods of labour induction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 77: 27-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.08.009

7. Radu VD, Vicoveanu P, Cărăuleanu A, Adam AM, Melinte-Popescu AS, Adam G, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients with Urosepsis and Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections-A Retrospective Study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(12): 2129. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122129

8. Assefa EM, Chane G, Teme A, Nigatu TA. Determinants of prelabor rupture of membrane among pregnant women attending governmental hospitals in Jimma zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia: A multi-center case-control study. PLoSOne. 2023; 18(11): e0294482. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0294482

9. Anemia in Pregnancy: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 233. Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 138(2): e55-e64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004477

10. Payne MS, Newnham JP, Doherty DA, Furfaro LL, Pendal NL, Loh DE, Keelan JA. A specific bacterial DNA signature in the vagina of Australian women in midpregnancy predicts high risk of spontaneous preterm birth (the Predict1000 study). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 224(2): 206.e1–206.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.034

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)