Main Article Content

Наталья Владимировна Артымук
Светлана Сергеевна Ламонова
Ольга Олеговна Чернова
Юлия Геннадьевна Черновская
Екатерина Леонидовна Харенкова
Ирина Николаевна Климчук
Ольга Борисовна Карелина

Abstract

Since the restriction on the introduction of mesh prostheses in pelvic floor surgery, there has been a need to perform effective and reliable surgical interventions using other implants for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. The possibility of using xenopericardial plates in gynecological practice remains a significant issue and represents a medical area of current interest for research.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using xenogeneic biomaterial for the correction of anterior-apical POP in women.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the gynecological department N 2 of the Clinical Hospital named after S.V. Belyaev. The design of the study is prospective, observational. The study included 10 postmenopausal women admitted for planned surgical treatment with anterior-apical POP. The average age of the patients was 62.0 ± 4.9 years. All patients underwent surgical treatment of anterior-apical POP according to the author's technique (patent application N 2024109896 dated April 11, 2024) using xenogeneic biological material of the KemPlas surgical universal xenopericardial mesh. The effectiveness and safety of the use of the author's technique were assessed 7 days, 1 month and 6 months after surgical treatment. The primary outcome is the presence of complications of surgical treatment (implant rejection), the secondary outcome is relapse of POP.

Results. During follow-up for 6 months, relapse of POP was not found in any patient. Infectious complications occurred in 4 patients (40 %). Implant rejection occurred in 4 (70 %): after 1 month – in two women (20 %), after 3 months – in 4 (40 %), in 1 (10 %) woman – after 5 months. In 3 (30 %) women, the postoperative period passed without complications: no inflammatory reactions, migration, or implant rejection were detected. These patients were 58, 65 and 70 years old; two older patients received long-term local estrogen therapy. The patients had no sexual activity, no heavy physical labor, and had normal body weight.

Conclusions. Thus, the use of xenogeneic biomaterial for the correction of anterior-apical pelvic organ prolapse in women has a high incidence of implant migration and rejection. Further studies of the effectiveness of the use of this biomaterial are possible only in patients with no provoking factors (sexual activity, obesity, heavy physical labor, etc.) and after adequate preoperative preparation with local estriol preparations.

Keywords

pelvic organ prolapse, xenogeneic biomaterial, xenopericardium, anterior-apical prolapse

Author Biographies

Наталья Владимировна Артымук,

Artymuk Natalia Vladimirovna
MD, PhD, professor, deputy editor of the journal Mother and Baby in Kuzbass.

She is the Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology №2, the Deputy Editor-in-Chief. She is also the President of the Kemerovo regional public organization “Association of obstetricians and gynecologists”, the chief obstetrician-gynecologist of the Siberian Federal district; the member of the Board of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the member of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology.

She has graduated from Kemerovo State Medical institute with honors. She studied in clinical residency in obstetrics and gynecology at School of Arenberg (Salzburg, Austria) and School of Bloomberg (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA). One is a specialist in ultrasound diagnostics in obstetrics and gynecology, endocrinology and endoscopic surgery. In 1996 in Barnaul she defended her PhD thesis and her doctoral thesis in 2003 in Moscow.

Her priorities are: endocrine gynecology, infertility, cervix uteri pathology, menopausal disorders, disorder of menstrual function, endoscopic and abdominal gynecological surgery.

She deals with reproductive health problems, non-surgical and surgical treatment of benign neoplasms of genital organs. She is an author of more than 450 scientific works, including 3 monographs and study manuals for doctors. She has her highest medical qualification category in “Obstetrics and gynecology”.

 
Светлана Сергеевна Ламонова,
head of the gynecology department N 2
Ольга Олеговна Чернова,
obstetrician-gynecologist of the gynecology department N 2
Юлия Геннадьевна Черновская,
obstetrician-gynecologist of the gynecology department N 2
Екатерина Леонидовна Харенкова,
candidate of medical sciences, obstetrician-gynecologist of the gynecology department N 2
Ирина Николаевна Климчук,
obstetrician-gynecologist of the gynecology department N 2
Ольга Борисовна Карелина,
candidate of medical sciences, docent of the department of obstetrics and gynecology named after prof. G.A. Ushakova

Article Details

Information about financing and conflict of interests

The study had no sponsorship.
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.

How to Cite

Артымук, Н. В., Ламонова, С. С., Чернова, О. О., Черновская, Ю. Г., Харенкова, Е. Л., Климчук, И. Н., & Карелина, О. Б. (2024). EXPERIENCE OF USING XENOPERICARDIAL SURGICAL MESH FOR CORRECTION OF ANTERAPICAL GENITAL PROLAPSE IN WOMEN. Mother and Baby in Kuzbass, 25(3), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.24412/2686-7338-2024-3-41-49

References

Weintraub AY, Glinter H, Marcus-Braun N. Narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Braz J Urol. 2020; 46(1): 5-14. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0581

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society; INTERIM UPDATE: This Practice Bulletin is updated as highlighted to reflect the US Food and Drug Administration order to stop the sale of transvaginal synthetic mesh products for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse.. Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019; 25(6): 397-408. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000794

Bezhenar VF, Derii EK, Ivanov OA, Azhimova ShM, Palastin PM. Markers of connective tissue dysfunction in the aspect of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Issues of gynecology, obstetrics and perinatology. 2020; 19(6): 90-95. Russian (Беженарь В.Ф., Дерий Э.К., Иванов О.А., Ажимова Ш.М., Паластин П.М. Маркеры дисфункции соединительной ткани в аспекте хирургического лечения пролапса тазовых органов //Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2020. Т. 19, № 6. С. 90-95.) doi: 10.20953/1726-1678-2020-6-90-95

Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 11(11): CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub6

Lau HH, Davila GW, Chen YY, Sartori MGF, Jármy-Di Bella ZIK, Tsai JM, et al. FIGO recommendations: Use of midurethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023; 161(2): 367-385. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14683

Dieter AA. Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Controversies in Surgical Treatment. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021; 48(3): 437-448. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.05.001

Rice NT, Hu Y, Slaughter JC, Ward RM. Pelvic mesh complications in women before and after the 2011 FDA public health notification. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013; 19(6): 333-338. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a330c1

Min H, Li H, Bingshu L, Yanxiang C, Lu C, Qing S, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of the application of adjuvant material in the repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapsed. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013; 287(5): 919-936. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2626-6

Silva-López MS, Alcántara-Quintana LE. The Era of Biomaterials: Smart Implants? ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2023; 6(8): 2982-2994. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.3c00284

Uchida T, Hamasaki A, Kuroda Y, Yamashita A, Nakai S, Kobayashi K, Sadahiro M. Gerbode defect and left ventricular-aortic discontinuity in prosthetic valve endocarditis. J Artif Organs. 2020; 23(3): 288-291. doi: 10.1007/s10047-019-01153-z

Merriman AL, Kennelly MJ. Biologic Grafts for Use in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: a Contemporary Review. Curr Urol Rep. 2020; 21(12): 52. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-01013-x

Bashkov VA, Nikolsky AV, Mikheev VV. Use of xenopericardium in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. New tasks of modern medicine: Proceedings of the II Intern. Scient. Conf., St. Petersburg, 20-23 May 2013. St. Petersburg: Renome, 2013. P. 33-36. Russian (Башков В.А., Никольский А.В., Михеев В.В. Применение ксеноперикарда в хирургическом лечении стрессового недержания мочи //Новые задачи современной медицины: Матер. II Междунар. науч. конф., Санкт-Петербург, 20-23 мая 2013 года. СПб.: Реноме, 2013. С. 33-36)

Shinkarev SA, Latyshev YuP, Klycheva ON. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with xenopericardial tissue. Research'n Practical Medicine Journal. 2018; 2: 77. Russian (Шинкарев С.А., Латышев Ю.П., Клычева О.Н. Реконструкция тазового дна ксеноперикардиальной тканью //Research'n Practical Medicine Journal. 2018. № 2. С. 77)

Selikhova MS, Ershov GV, Ershov AG. Pelvic organ prolapse is a hidden epidemic of the 21st century. Advances in gerontology. 2021; 34(3): 431-437. Russian (Селихова М.С., Ершов Г.В., Ершов А.Г. Пролапс тазовых органов скрытая эпидемия XXI века //Успехи геронтологии. 2021. Т. 34, № 3. С. 431-437.) doi: 10.34922/AE.2021.34.3.013

Sohlberg EM, Dallas KB, Weeks BT, Elliott CS, Rogo-Gupta L. Reoperation rates for pelvic organ prolapse repairs with biologic and synthetic grafts in a large population-based cohort. Int Urogynecol J. 2020; 31(2): 291-301. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04035-3

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4