REGIONAL FEATURES AGE OF MOTHER AND ANTHROPOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF NEWBORN CHILDREN REPUBLIC OF CRIMEA
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aims – study of regional characteristics of the age of mothers living in the Republic of Crimea and the main anthropometric indicators of newborn children of the Republic of Crimea (body weight, body length) depending on the age of the woman.
Material and methods. The study was conducted on the basis of GBUZ RK «Simferopol Clinical Maternity Hospital No. 1». A retrospective analysis of medical documentation was carried out: 1300 Childbirth histories (form N 096/y) of women living in the Republic of Crimea.
Results. A study was made of the age of mothers at the birth of a child living in the Republic of Crimea. It was found that the largest number of births occurred in the age interval of 26-30 years (35.69 %), approximately the same number of births occurred in the intervals of 31-35 (26.08 %) and 21-25 years (23.31 %). The minimum number of births falls on the intervals of age younger than 20 years (3.92 %) and older than 40 years (1 %). The average age of mothers was within 28.91 ± 5.05 years. The minimum age is 16 years, the maximum is 47 years. The average number of pregnancies was 2.22 ± 1.32, childbirth – 1.76 ± 0.86. In the age period up to 20 years, women had the first and second births, in the remaining age intervals there are births from the first to the sixth. The difference between the average age of mothers at the birth of the first child and the second child is 3.76 years. Between subsequent births, it decreases and is between the second and third – 1.9 years, the third and fourth – 1.67 years, the fourth and fifth – 0.6 years towards the fourth child, and only between the fifth and sixth increases, and is 4,47 years old.
Regional features of the age of mothers living in the Republic of Crimea were revealed. The region fits into the general picture of the Russian Federation of increasing the age of mothers at childbirth. The average age of mothers at the birth of the first child was 26.47 ± 4.54 years, the second – 30.23 ± 4.51 years, the third – 32.13 ± 3.99 years, the fourth – 33.80 ± 4.50 years, the fifth – 33.20 ± 4.13 years old, the sixth – 37.67 ± 8.62 years old. Depending on the age of the mother, an assessment was made of the main anthropometric indicators of newborns in the Republic of Crimea (body weight and length).
Conclusion. The results obtained made it possible to identify regional features of the age of mothers living in the Republic of Crimea and the main anthropometric indicators of newborns of the Republic of Crimea (body weight, body length) depending on the age of the woman.
Keywords
Article Details
Information about financing and conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no apparent or potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
How to Cite
References
Arkhangel'skii VN, Kalachikova ON. Maternal age at first birth: dynamics, regional differences, determination. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2020; 13(5): 200-217. Russian (Архангельский В.Н., Калачикова О.Н. Возраст матери при рождении первого ребенка: динамика, региональные различия, детерминация //Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2020. Т. 13, № 5. С. 200-217.) DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.5.71.12
Arkhangel’skii VN. Changes in the age model of fertility in Russia: conditional and real generations. Institutes for the development of human potential in the context of modern challenges: Sat. Art. XI Ural Demographic Forum. Volume I. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020. P. 103-112. Russian (Архангельский В.Н. Изменения возрастной модели рождаемости в России: условные и реальные поколения //Институты развития человеческого потенциала в условиях современных вызовов: сб. ст. XI Уральского демографического форума. Том I. Екатеринбург: Институт экономики УрО РАН, 2020. С. 103-112)
Arkhangel’skiy VN. Transformation of indicators of fertility in real generations of the russian women. Population. 2014; 3: 26-41. Russian (Архангельский В. Н. Трансформация показателей рождаемости в реальных поколениях российских женщин //Народонаселение. 2014. № 3. С. 26-41.) URL: http://www.isesp-ras.ru/images/narodonaselenie/ 2014_3.pdf
Zakharov SV. Changes in the birth rate in Russia in recent decades and expected prospects: results obtained on the basis of special birth tables for real generations. Population of Russia 2017. Twenty-fifth annual demographic report. M.: Ed. house of the Higher School of Economics. 2019. P. 135-148. Russian (Захаров С.В. Изменения рождаемости в России в последние десятилетия и ожидаемые перспективы: результаты, полученные на основе специальных таблиц рождаемости для реальных поколений //Население России 2017. Двадцать пятый ежегодный демографический доклад. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2019. С. 135-148.) URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/knigi/ns_r17/acrobat/glava3.pdf
Freika T. Birth rates in Russia and Germany: similarities and differences. Demoscope Weekly. 2010; 421-422. Russian (Фрейка Т. Рождаемость в России и Германии: сходства и различия //Демоскоп Weekly. 2010. № 421-422.) URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2010/0421/tema01.php
Freika T, Zakharov S. Fertility trends in Russia during the past half century: period and cohort perspectives. Demographic Review. 2014; 1(1): 106-143. Russian (Фрейка Т., Захаров С. Эволюция рождаемости в России за полвека: оптика условных и реальных поколений //Демографическое обозрение. 2014. Т. 1, № 1. С. 106-143.) DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v1i1.1828
Ipatova AA, Tyndik AO. Reproductive age: 30 years old in preferences and biographies. Universe of Russia. 2015; 24(4): 123-148. Russian (Ипатова А.А., Тындик А.О. Репродуктивный возраст: 30-летний рубеж в предпочтениях и биографиях //Мир России. 2015. № 24(4). С. 123-148)
Frejka T, Sardon J-P. First birth trends in developed countries: a cohort analysis. Demographic Research. 2006; 15(6): 147-180. Available at: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol15/6/15-6.pdf
Shcherbakova EM. Molodezh SNG, demograficheskii portret. Demoscope Weekly. 2017; 711-712: 26-34. Russian (Щербакова Е.М. Молодежь СНГ, демографический портрет //Демоскоп Weekly. 2017. № 711-712. С. 26-34.) URL: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2017/0711/barometer711.pdf
Aksyonova SYu. Advanced maternal age: the case of Ukraine. Demography and social economy. 2014; 2(22): 57-67. Ukrainian (Похилий вік матері: приклад України //Демографія та соціальна економіка. 2014. № 2(22). P. 57-67.) DOI: 10.15407/DSE2014.02.057
Aksyonova SYu. Serednіi vіk materі pri narodzhennі ditini: chi mozhliva reversіia? Demography and social economy. 2018; 2(33): 53-66. Ukrainian (Аксьонова С.Ю. Середній вік матері при народженні дитини: чи можлива реверсія? //Демографія та соціальна економіка. 2018. № 2(33). С. 53-66)
Aksyonova SYu. Interrelationships between the mother's average age at childbirth and the birth rate. Demography and social economy. 2019; 2(36): 23-38. Ukrainian (Аксьонова С.Ю. Взаємозв’язки середнього віку матері при народженні дитини і рівня народжуваності //Демографія та соціальна економіка. 2019. № 2(36). С. 23-38.) URL: https://dse.org.ua/arhcive/36/2_(36)_2019.pdf
Ediev DM. On the role of the average age of the mother at the birth of a child in long-term demographic dynamics. Voprosy statistiki. 2006; 11: 23-31. Russian (Эдиев Д.М. О роли среднего возраста матери при рождении ребенка в долгосрочной демографической динамике //Вопросы статистики. 2006. № 11. С. 23-31)
Fakhrislamova RT. Otkladyvanie rozhdeniia detei (perventsev) v Rossii i v mire. Globalnye vyzovy i regionalnoe razvitie v zerkale sotsiologicheskikh izmerenii: mater. III mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. internet-konf., 26-30 marta 2018 g. Ch. 2. Vologda: VolNTs RAN, 2018. P. 275-283. Russian (Фахрисламова Р.Т. Откладывание рождения детей (первенцев) в России и в мире //Глобальные вызовы и региональное развитие в зеркале социологических измерений: матер. III междунар. науч.-практ. интернет-конф., 26-30 марта 2018 г. Ч. 2. Вологда: ВолНЦ РАН, 2018. С. 275-283)
Lesthaeghe R. The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition. Population and Development Review. 2010; 36(2): 211-251
Arkhangelskii VN, Zinkina IuV, Shulgin SG. Fertility differentiation according to female education levels in russia: current situation and forecast scenarios. Population. 2019; 1: 21-36. Russian (Архангельский В.Н., Зинькина Ю.В., Шульгин С.Г. Рождаемость у женщин с разным уровнем образования: текущее состояние и прогнозные сценарии //Народонаселение. 2019. № 1. С. 21-36)
Gordo LR. Why are women delaying motherhood in Germany? Feminist Economics. 2009; 15(4): 57-75. DOI: 10.1080/13545700903153955